Dynamics of the Baseball-Bat Collision,
Alan M. Nathan, American Journal of Physics 68, 979-990 (2000).
The moment of impact
Courtesy, Champaign News-Gazette
This paper develops a dynamic model for wooden bats, taking into account their vibrational properties. The model is then used to describe the collision between bat and ball. Based on the preliminary version of this paper, Jeremy Manier wrote an article Science has a Sweet Spot for Baseball that appeared in the April 3, 2000 issue of the Chicago Tribune (front page, above the fold!), which features an interview with me about the bat-ball collision.
Characterizing the Performance of Baseball Bats,
Alan M. Nathan, American Journal of Physics 71, 134-143 (2003).
schematic of the baseball-bat collision in the
(a) usual field frame and the (b) bat rest frame.
This article defines a set of laboratory measurements that can be performed on a bat and then used to predict performance in the field. Using a computational model, it is shown that bat performance depends on the interplay of the elasticity of the ball-bat collision, the inertial properties of the ball and bat, and the bat swing speed. This paper is the foundation for modern efforts to regolate the performance of non-wood bats.
Scattering of a Baseball by a Bat,
Rod Cross and Alan M. Nathan, American Journal of Physics 74, 896-904 (2006).
This paper reports on an experiment to study the spin resulting from a low-speed ball-bat collision. The data are relevant for determining whether a hit curveball has more backspin than a hit fastball. Click here to see a short video clip of the experiment in action. That handsome fellow holding the bat is Rod.
Experimental Study of the Gear Effect in Ball Collisions,
Rod Cross and Alan M. Nathan, American Journal of Physics 75, 658-664 (2007).
Effect of Spin on the Flight of a Baseball,
Alan M. Nathan, American Journal of Physics 76, 199-224 (2008).
Forces on a baseball in flight.
In this paper I report on an experiment to measure the quantitative effect of spin on the flight of a baseball. This topic has relevance for the movement of pitched baseballs as well as on the trajectory of a batted baseball.
- A talk based on this work was presented at the IMAC XXIV Meeting of the Society of Experimental Mechanics, January 30, 2006.
- A presentation based on this work entitled "Baseball aerodynamics: What do we know and how do we know it?" was presented at the SABR36 convention in Seattle (June 2006).
- A presentation based on this work entitled "The Flight of a Baseball" was presented at the March 2010 APS meeting.
Paradoxical Pop-ups: Why are They Difficolt to Catch?,
Michael. K. McBeath, Alan M. Nathan, A. Terry Bahill, and David G. Baldwin, American Journal of Physics 76, 723-729 (2008).
Example of a paradoxical popup.
This paper examines the unusual trajectories of towering popups with lots of backspin. It is shown that the normal strategy used by outfielders to intercept fly balls leads to systematic vacillation in running paths for these popups. One example is shown in the animation. For another example, take a look at this video taken from a Red Sox vs. Tampa Bay game on September 15, 2008. Note the third baseman Kevin Cash (normally a catcher) overruns the ball, which initially was headed toward the seats along the third baseline but then veers back towards the field. This is the quintessential paradoxical popup, indicative of a lot of backspin on the ball. Note also what happens to the ball when it hits the ground. The backwards bounce is further indication of large amount of backspin on the ball.
Performance Versus Moment of Inertia of Sporting Instruments,
Rod Cross and Alan M. Nathan, Sports Technology 2, 7-15 (2009).
by Rod Cross and myself (Sports Technology, vol. 2, pp 7-15, 2009). It is shown that for a given coefficient of restitution (COR), both the intrinsic power and the swing speed of a tennis racquet or baseball bat correlate strongly with the MOI about an axis through the handle and only weakly with the mass.
A Determination of the Dynamic Response of Softballs,
Lloyd V. Smith, Alan M. Nathan, and Joseph G. Duris, Sports Engineering 12, 163-169 (2010).
Corked Bats, Juiced Balls, and Humidors: The Physics of Cheating in Baseball,
Alan M. Nathan, Lloyd V. Smith, Warren L. Faber, and Daniel A. Russell, American Journal of Physics 79, 575-580 (2011).
Three questions of relevance to Major League Baseball are investigated from a physics perspective. Can a baseball be hit farther with a corked bat? Is there evidence that the baseball is more lively today than in earlier years? Can storing baseballs in a temperature- or humidity-controlled environment significantly affect home run production? These questions are subjected to a physics analysis, including an experiment and an interpretation of the data. The answers to the three questions are no, no, and yes. A very nice popularized summary of the paper was written by Chris Solomon and appeared in Smithsonian Magazine in June, 2011.
A Comparative Study of Baseball Bat Performance,
Alan M. Nathan, J. J. Crisco, R. M. Greenwald, D. A. Russell, and Lloyd V. Smith, Sports Engineering 13, 153-162 (2011).
Reducing the Effect of the Ball on Bat Performance Measurements,
Alan M. Nathan, Lloyd V. Smith, and Warren L. Faber, Sports Technology 4, 19-28 (2012).
A new technique is described to normalize the performance of a bat to the coefficient of restitution and stiffness of the baseball or softball used to measure the performance. The technique is developed theoretically and tested experimentally. It is shown to be vastly superior to a different normalization technique that has been popolarly used.
Simplified Models for the Drag Coefficient of a Pitched Baseball,
David Kagan and Alan M. Nathan, The Physics Teacher 52, 278-280 (2014).
Techniques are described to determine the drag coefficient from PITCHf/x data. These techniques shoold be suitable for classroom instruction in introductory physics courses.
Statcast and the Trajectory Calculator,
David Kagan and Alan M. Nathan, The Physics Teacher, 55, 134-136 (2017).
A tool is presented for calculating trajectories of baseballs and used to analyze a home run hits by Alex Rodriquez in 2015.
Oblique Collisions of Baseballs or Softballs with a Bat,
Jeffrey R. Kensrud, Alan M. Nathan, and Lloyd V. Smith, American Journal of Physics, 85, 503-509 (2017).
Oblique impacts of a swinging bat with a stationary ball are performed and the resulting velocity and spin of the batted ball are measured. The results are analyzed in the context of a ball-bat collision model and the parameters of that model are determined.
A Study of Softball Player Swing Speed,
Lloyd Smith, Jeff Broker, and Alan Nathan, Sports Dynamics Discovery and Applications, eds. A. Subic, P. Trivailo, and F. Alam, RMIT University, Melbourne Australia, pp. 12-17 (2003).
This presents the results of a 2002 field study sponsored by the Amateur Softball Association. The data show that the swing speed of a typical player is inversely related to the bat moment of inertia about the handle (with a fixed bat weight) and nearly independent of the weight of the bat (at fixed moment of inertia).
The Physics of the Trampoline Effect in Baseball and Softball Bats,
Alan M. Nathan, Daniel A. Russell, and Lloyd V. Smith, The Engineering of Sport V, eds. M. Hubbard, R. Mehta, and J. Pallis, UC Davis, Davis CA, pp. 38-44 (2004). Proceedings of 5th ISEA Conference, Davis CA, September 2004.
Toy model for the trampoline effect.
This paper presents a simple physical picture of the "trampoline effect" in hollow bats and demonstrates how the effect leads to a larger coefficient of restitution. A special section presents new data showing there is no measureable trampoline effect with a corked bat. This paper was presented at the September 2004 meeting of the International Sports Engineering Association in Davis, CA.
Effect of Ball Properties on the Ball-Bat Coefficient of Restitution,
A. M. Nathan and L. V. Smith, 4th Asia-Pacific Congress on Sports Technology, Honololu, Hawaii, The Impact of Technology on Sport, 257-262 (2009).
This paper presents a simple physical model relating the ball-bat coefficient of restitution (BBCOR) to the ball COR and stiffness. Using the model, a technique is developed to normalize the BBCOR to a standard ball. This paper will be presented at the 4th Asia-Pacific Congress on Sports Technology (APCST2009) in September 2009 and was published in the proceedings.
Analysis of Knuckleball Trajectories,
Alan M. Nathan, Procedia Engineering 34, 116-121 (2012). Proceedings of 9th ISEA Conference, Lowell MA, Joly 2012.
An analysis of knuckleball trajectories is presented using data from the PITCHf/x video tracking system for pitches thrown in actual MLB games. The data reveal that, contrary to popolar belief, knuckleball trajectories are as smooth as those from normal pitches. However, the data also show that the deflection of a knuckleball from a straight-line trajectory is essentially random in both magnitude and direction.
Spin of a Batted Baseball,
Alan M. Nathan, Jonas Cantakos, Russ Kesman, Biju Mathew, and Wes Lukash, Procedia Engineering 34, 182-187 (2012). Proceedings of 9th ISEA Conference, Lowell MA, Joly 2012.
Experiments are conducted to investigate the spin of a baseball undergoing an oblique collision with a bat. A baseball was fired horizontally at speeds up to 120 mph onto a 3"-diameter cylinder of wood that was rigidly attached to a wall. In one experiment, a two-wheel pitching machine was used in which the backspin or topspin of the incident ball coold be adjusted. In another experiment, an air cannon was used to project the ball with no spin. In both experiments, markers on the ball were tracked with high-speed video to determine the velocity and spin vectors, before and after the scattering. Our primary results are as follows: (1) For a given angle of incidence, the scattered spin is nearly independent of the incident spin; (2) The spin of the scattered baseball is considerably larger than expected for a model whereby the ball rolls before leaving the surface. Implications for the spin of batted baseballs are explored.
What New Technologies Are Teaching Us About the Game of Baseball,
Alan M. Nathan, Proceedings of the EuroMech Physics of Sports Conference, Paris, April 2012 (to be published).
Dependence of fly ball distance on vertical launch angle
for balls hit in the velocity range shown in the legend.
These are data from actual MLB games in which the TrackMan
Doppler radar system was used to measure the fly
The trajectory of a baseball moving through the air is very different from the one we teach in our introductory classes, in which the only force is that due to gravity. In reality, the aerodynamic drag force (which retards the motion) and the Magnus force on a spinning baseball (which causes the ball to curve) play very important roles that are crucial to many of the subtleties of the game. Despite their importance, our knowledge of how these forces affect the flight of the baseball has been qualitative at best. Recently, however, new tools have been developed for measuring accurate baseball trajectories during an actual game. These tools include both video tracking (the PITCHf/x and related systems) and the TrackMan Doppler radar system. In this article, I will discuss these new tools and give some examples of what they are teaching us about the game of baseball.
Relating Baseball Seam Height to Carry Distance,
Jeffrey R. Kensrud, Lloyd V. Smith, Alan Nathan, and Derek Nevins, Procedia Engineering 112, 406-411 (2015). Proceedings of the 7th Asia-Pacific Congress on Sports Technology APCST 2015.
A. M. Nathan, Scientific American 277, 102-103 (1997).
Bat Performance Standards in NCAA Baseball
Alan Nathan, Baseball Research Journal 33, 11 (2003)
Ball Exit Speed Ratio (BESR)
James Ashton-Miller, Michael Carroll, Kenneth Johnson, and Alan Nathan, Baseball Research Journal 33, 12-14 (2003)
Nickel and Dime Pitches
Dave Baldwin, Terry Bahill, and Alan Nathan, Baseball Research Journal 35, 25-29 (2006)
An Analysis of the Gyroball
Alan Nathan and Dave Baldwin, Baseball Research Journal 36, 77-80 (2007)
The Possible Effect of Steroids on Home-Run Production
Alan Nathan, Baseball Research Journal 38, 36-38 (2009)
Comparing the Performance of Baseball Bats
Alan M. Nathan, Baseball Analysts, January 18, 2010
Home Runs and Humidors: Is There a Connection?
Alan M. Nathan, Baseball Prospectus, February 25, 2011
The Knuckleball Mystique: Using PITCHf/x to Distinguish Perception from Reality
Alan M. Nathan, Baseball Prospectus, January 31, 2012
Dissecting a Mystery Pitch
Alan M. Nathan, The Hardball Times, January 31, 2012
Global Warming and Home Runs: Is There a Connection?
Alan M. Nathan, Baseball Prospectus, June 5, 2012
How Far Did That Fly Ball Travel?
Alan M. Nathan, Baseball Prospectus, January 8, 2013
Is Late Break Real?
Alan M. Nathan, Baseball Prospectus, March 26, 2013
Uncovering the Mysteries of the Knuckleball
Alan M. Nathan, The Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2014.
Testing TrackMan: Just How Well Does TrackMan Work?
Alan M. Nathan, Lloyd Smith, Jeff Kensrud, Eric Lang, Baseball Prospectus, April 2, 2014
The Physics of a Truly Amazing Throw
Alan M. Nathan, Baseball Prospectus, June 11, 2014
How Far Did That Fly Ball Travel? (Redux)
Alan M. Nathan, Lloyd Smith, Jeff Kensrud, Eric Lang, Baseball Prospectus, December 9, 2014. NOTE: If you are not able to access the Baseball Prospectus article, you read it here.
Regulating the Performance of Bats
Alan M. Nathan, The Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2015.
All Spin Is Not Alike
Alan M. Nathan, Baseball Prospectus, March 31, 2015
A Tale of Two Dingers
Alan M. Nathan, The Hardball Times, April 23, 2015
Optimizing the Swing
Alan M. Nathan, The Hardball Times, November 11, 2015
Optimizing the Swing, Part Deux: Paying Homage to Teddy Ballgame
Alan M. Nathan, The Hardball Times, December 24, 2015
Going Deep On Goin' Deep
Alan M. Nathan, The Hardball Times, April 6, 2016
Exit Speed and Home Runs
Alan M. Nathan, The Hardball Times, July 18, 2016
Spinning Out of Control
Alan M. Nathan, Fangraphs, October 26, 2016
Estimating Release Point Using Gameday's New Start_Speed
Dan Brooks and Alan M. Nathan, Baseball Prospectus, April 5, 2017
A Humidor At Chase Field: What's Up With That
Alan M. Nathan, The Hardball Times, April 17, 2017
Fly Ball Carry and the Home Run Surge
Alan M. Nathan, The Hardball Times, August 24, 2017
For many decades baseball has been a great source of entertainment and fun for a huge range of fans from all over the world. As we know, the first game was played in Hoboken, New Jersey on June 19, 1846. On that day the NY Knickerbockers were defeated by the NY Nine with the score of 23-1. The baseball players were keeping up to the rules, established by Alexander J. Cartwright. There’s also a myth that the inventor of baseball was Abner Doubleday, but that is not true. The basic rules of the game were created by Alexander Cartwright.
The Cincinnati Red Stockings were the first professional baseball team, who played a range of successful games in 1869. The rules have been changing during the whole period of the game’s existence. In 1900 they were almost like the ones we have today. Nowadays a new generation of baseball players has come. Among them is Mark McGwire, Sammie Sosa, etc.
However, there’s one significant difference between the players of our days and the ones from the previous decades. The baseball players are making huge sums of money now. Millions of dollars they get as their prizes. Also the equipment for the game has changed. For example, it was like that in the case with gloves. At first, the baseball players wore thin leather pieces on their hands. It had 5 holes for fingers. In 1890ies the gloves looked like the ones the players wear nowadays.
You may wonder how come that…